🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of states are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". A law may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to approve a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," stated one MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, action is mostly occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures mandating guardian approval for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various figures to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from these regions, other states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, international agencies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this global debate continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments around the world are less and less content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.